Search changeset comments
Source:R/osmapi_changeset_discussion.R
osm_search_comment_changeset_discussion.RdReturns changeset comments that match the specified query. If no query is provided, the most recent changeset comments are returned.
Usage
osm_search_comment_changeset_discussion(
user,
from,
to,
format = c("R", "xml", "json"),
tags_in_columns = FALSE
)Arguments
- user
Search for changeset comments created by the user with the given user id (numeric) or display name (character).
- from
Beginning date range. See details for the valid formats.
- to
End date range. Only works when
fromis supplied. See details for the valid formats.- format
Format of the output. Can be
"R"(default),"xml", or"json".If
FALSE(default), the tags of the changesets are saved in a single list columntagscontaining adata.framefor each changeset with the keys and values. IfTRUE, add a column for each key. Ignored ifformat != "R".
Value
If format = "R", returns a data frame with one comment per If format = "xml", returns a
xml2::xml_document. If format = "json", returns a list with the json structure.
Details
The valid formats for from and to parameters are POSIXt values or characters preferably in
ISO 8601 format.
See also
Other changeset discussion's functions:
osm_comment_changeset_discussion(),
osm_hide_comment_changeset_discussion(),
osm_subscribe_changeset_discussion()
Examples
# See the latest changeset comments globally:
osm_search_comment_changeset_discussion()
#> id date visible uid user
#> 1 1676446 2026-10-15 11:11:36 TRUE 20051396 rajdhani
#> 2 1676445 2026-10-15 11:11:04 TRUE 22887018 pixelmender
#> 3 1676444 2026-10-15 11:05:56 TRUE 24475651 zognimorza
#> 4 1676443 2026-10-15 11:05:55 TRUE 1656182 Negreheb
#> 5 1676442 2026-10-15 11:05:16 TRUE 1821195 Twanton
#> 6 1676441 2026-10-15 11:04:31 TRUE 1656182 Negreheb
#> 7 1676440 2026-10-15 11:03:39 TRUE 1656182 Negreheb
#> 8 1676439 2026-10-15 10:56:59 TRUE 23499688 Clairness
#> 9 1676438 2026-10-15 10:53:22 TRUE 1206509 Sanniu
#> 10 1676437 2026-10-15 10:48:03 TRUE 11002689 wies1
#> 11 1676436 2026-10-15 10:44:56 TRUE 23400839 Nokkis
#> 12 1676435 2026-10-15 10:41:33 TRUE 23132852 fluffycupcakes
#> 13 1676434 2026-10-15 10:38:53 TRUE 23608815 9_tab
#> 14 1676433 2026-10-15 10:37:44 TRUE 549389 ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy
#> 15 1676432 2026-10-15 10:35:54 TRUE 11198759 gojek_dewi
#> 16 1676431 2026-10-15 10:30:49 TRUE 10630524 Fjana
#> 17 1676430 2026-10-15 10:28:34 TRUE 1940323 SekeRob
#> 18 1676429 2026-10-15 10:25:32 TRUE 21865792 HantDX
#> 19 1676428 2026-10-15 10:17:55 TRUE 1722488 Mateusz Konieczny
#> 20 1676427 2026-10-15 10:15:13 TRUE 16047452 kingkingHK
#> 21 1676426 2026-10-15 10:11:56 TRUE 16047452 kingkingHK
#> 22 1676425 2026-10-15 10:09:29 TRUE 16047452 kingkingHK
#> 23 1676424 2026-10-15 10:07:43 TRUE 337684 felipeeugenio
#> 24 1676423 2026-10-15 10:04:13 TRUE 2649988 FajrAl
#> 25 1676422 2026-10-15 09:49:33 TRUE 16156201 Surveyor Lewinsky
#> 26 1676421 2026-10-15 09:40:53 TRUE 4443533 MaestroGlanz
#> 27 1676420 2026-10-15 09:35:52 TRUE 113813 AndersAndersson
#> 28 1676419 2026-10-15 09:32:44 TRUE 2649988 FajrAl
#> 29 1676418 2026-10-15 09:26:52 TRUE 3305165 luisforte
#> 30 1676417 2026-10-15 09:26:00 TRUE 20051395 ajmat
#> 31 1676416 2026-10-15 09:25:35 TRUE 24310433 SambalPecelMadiun
#> 32 1676415 2026-10-15 09:24:39 TRUE 60129 Tomas Straupis
#> 33 1676414 2026-10-15 09:21:14 TRUE 20315854 Matix 102
#> 34 1676413 2026-10-15 09:12:09 TRUE 24603523 BistakErik
#> 35 1676412 2026-10-15 09:07:29 TRUE 16047452 kingkingHK
#> 36 1676411 2026-10-15 08:59:27 TRUE 20144444 MappingMore
#> 37 1676410 2026-10-15 08:56:43 TRUE 24239154 Preben Vangberg
#> 38 1676409 2026-10-15 08:56:01 TRUE 20051395 ajmat
#> 39 1676408 2026-10-15 08:55:30 TRUE 24662295 Manutenza
#> 40 1676407 2026-10-15 08:49:49 TRUE 10339681 Znaika
#> 41 1676406 2026-10-15 08:48:26 TRUE 1813986 AndyB_66
#> 42 1676405 2026-10-15 08:46:17 TRUE 28992 gallseife
#> 43 1676404 2026-10-15 08:42:46 TRUE 21660928 KennyDap
#> 44 1676403 2026-10-15 08:42:37 TRUE 16047452 kingkingHK
#> 45 1676402 2026-10-15 08:39:25 TRUE 21298337 muonci
#> 46 1676401 2026-10-15 08:35:45 TRUE 60129 Tomas Straupis
#> 47 1676400 2026-10-15 08:31:57 TRUE 2859698 assanges
#> 48 1676399 2026-10-15 08:30:31 TRUE 1293194 nevw
#> 49 1676398 2026-10-15 08:29:05 TRUE 21298337 muonci
#> 50 1676397 2026-10-15 08:28:25 TRUE 715684 Eebie
#> 51 1676396 2026-10-15 08:26:31 TRUE 23731179 einufo
#> 52 1676395 2026-10-15 08:22:38 TRUE 2859698 assanges
#> 53 1676394 2026-10-15 08:20:16 TRUE 24642205 Ktn123
#> 54 1676393 2026-10-15 08:18:54 TRUE 196396 qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
#> 55 1676392 2026-10-15 08:14:54 TRUE 24239154 Preben Vangberg
#> 56 1676391 2026-10-15 08:13:40 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 57 1676390 2026-10-15 08:13:01 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 58 1676389 2026-10-15 08:12:26 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 59 1676388 2026-10-15 08:07:51 TRUE 20051395 ajmat
#> 60 1676387 2026-10-15 08:06:31 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 61 1676386 2026-10-15 08:05:45 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 62 1676385 2026-10-15 08:05:07 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 63 1676384 2026-10-15 08:04:27 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 64 1676383 2026-10-15 08:03:44 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 65 1676382 2026-10-15 07:57:15 TRUE 24576748 MrJKL96
#> 66 1676381 2026-10-15 07:56:05 TRUE 6250193 Kovoschiz
#> 67 1676380 2026-10-15 07:56:02 TRUE 10815817 vectorial8192
#> 68 1676379 2026-10-15 07:55:32 TRUE 6250193 Kovoschiz
#> 69 1676378 2026-10-15 07:51:48 TRUE 20174525 sjrowla4
#> 70 1676377 2026-10-15 07:47:40 TRUE 24123883 kabahas
#> 71 1676376 2026-10-15 07:46:08 TRUE 17966 Protoxenus
#> 72 1676375 2026-10-15 07:45:09 TRUE 261189 Wright One
#> 73 1676374 2026-10-15 07:42:28 TRUE 10815817 vectorial8192
#> 74 1676373 2026-10-15 07:38:06 TRUE 6250193 Kovoschiz
#> 75 1676372 2026-10-15 07:36:25 TRUE 15671 habi
#> 76 1676371 2026-10-15 07:34:43 TRUE 15671 habi
#> 77 1676370 2026-10-15 07:32:46 TRUE 1813986 AndyB_66
#> 78 1676369 2026-10-15 07:31:57 TRUE 10815817 vectorial8192
#> 79 1676368 2026-10-15 07:30:20 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 80 1676367 2026-10-15 07:29:39 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 81 1676366 2026-10-15 07:28:47 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 82 1676365 2026-10-15 07:28:12 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 83 1676364 2026-10-15 07:26:45 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 84 1676363 2026-10-15 07:26:14 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 85 1676362 2026-10-15 07:25:21 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 86 1676361 2026-10-15 07:24:43 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 87 1676360 2026-10-15 07:23:51 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 88 1676359 2026-10-15 07:23:17 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 89 1676358 2026-10-15 07:22:33 TRUE 21748901 Ponderosopine
#> 90 1676357 2026-10-15 07:22:29 TRUE 16577436 Wildsharky
#> 91 1676356 2026-10-15 07:20:28 TRUE 3538539 micheleOSM3
#> 92 1676355 2026-10-15 07:16:52 TRUE 458641 uvi
#> 93 1676354 2026-10-15 07:13:32 TRUE 24662399 rmwiltvank
#> 94 1676353 2026-10-15 07:12:09 TRUE 60129 Tomas Straupis
#> 95 1676352 2026-10-15 07:04:38 TRUE 4032466 Steube
#> 96 1676351 2026-10-15 07:02:02 TRUE 22277224 vrix
#> 97 1676350 2026-10-15 07:00:59 TRUE 6250193 Kovoschiz
#> 98 1676349 2026-10-15 06:53:40 TRUE 133839 mzioma
#> 99 1676348 2026-10-15 06:44:15 TRUE 564990 mavl
#> 100 1676347 2026-10-15 06:43:17 TRUE 23168 adas
#> comment_text
#> 1 Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190551368
#> 2 Apologies. Feel free to revert my changeset if it's too far off.\n\nAll the best.
#> 3 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14286549364\n\nda ging wohl was schief
#> 4 Warum machst du überhaupt diese ganze basemap anpassungen? Basemap ist oft genug falsch und OSM will auch gar nicht die basemap sein. \n\nAusserdem wolltest du doch aufhören? Dafür machst du aber noch sehr viel.
#> 5 Ik heb in Organic Maps op huisnummer 16 geklikt en vandaar de wijzigingen aangebracht. Ik zag wel dat het huisnummer op de kaart verdween. Moet ik op de plaats van bv de ingang een nieuw museumpunt maken? Corrigeer het maar, zodat de 16 weer in beeld komt.
#> 6 Die ganze Relation macht doch alles nur komplizierter. Und wieso gibts davon 14 Versionen innerhalb eines Tages?
#> 7 Wozu gibts die relation überhaupt? Die macht ja so meiner Meinung nach gar keinen Sinn und macht nur alles komplizierter.
#> 8 Yes, typically parking lots, driveways, even access roads into and throughout industrial properties are not maintained by local city, parish, or state. However, they are mapped and tagged with tags such as highway=service, and depending on additional specific uses, they could be tagged with service=parking_aisle, service=driveway, etc. These roads typically do not have a name=*, as they are not officially named - with some exceptions. I highly recommend reading the highway=* and highway=service wiki pages, which you can get to by clicking the tag in this comment, it's a highlighted link. An excerpt from the highway=service page states:\n\n"The highway=service tag denotes ways used for vehicle access to a building, parking lot, service station, business estate, beach, campsite, etc. Service ways are usually not part of the public street network and may sometimes be inaccessible to the general public"\n\nGovernment maintained highways are normally tagged with highway=motorway, highway=primary, highway=secondary, highway=tertiary, highway=unclassified, highway=residential, and many other highway=* tags, typically with a name=* tag.\n\nThe term "highway" may be confusing, but that is why we define what sort of highway it is, the roads you deleted were tagged with highway=service. \n\nI understand the pain of turning into a spot with an almost impossibly navigable area in a semi cab hauling about 60' worth of space for equipment to deliver the load (rollback + double car hauler trailer), but ultimately this should be on the driver to check via maps or survey in person before attempting to turn into an unfamiliar area. If there are truly no trucks permitted entry, with signage that states no thru trucks, or no trucks in general, the highway=* way may be tagged with hgv=no, signifying that heavy goods vehicles (semis, essentially, basic OpenStreetMap tags are made with European terms in mind) are not permitted on that highway=* way.
#> 9 Hi, adjacent road name שמעון מישורי, not שמיון מישורי.\nCan you ensure that you put the right spelling into the address?
#> 10 Hallo,\ndanke für den Hinweis. Das war ein Fehler, der mir bedauerlicherweise bei diesem Gebäude bzw. POI unterlaufen ist - ich habe dies soeben korrigiert\nGruss\nwies1
#> 11 if the road is under construction, add construction=* tag and set highway=construction https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction\n\nThis enables renderers to render properly, just setting access=no confuses users of those renderers. (This way change came up on a bike router discussion)
#> 12 The buildings were in fact built as data centers, there is no reason to tag it as building=commercial. If you wanted to specify that the building is now used differently, you can use amenity= or building:use= tags\n\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190550165
#> 13 So at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230537431/history/3 you removed the details of the POI (restaurant) and left only the building ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230537431/history/5 ). The POI became https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14285584159 but lacks address and original source? Is this representative of these edits?
#> 14 Bonjour!\nLe nom du CPE était déjà sur l'area amenity, comme expliqué sur le wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool (section "Single school on one site")\n\nJ'ai corrigé.\nMerci et bonne journée!
#> 15 Halo, terima kasih untuk feedbacknya. Saat ini untuk tagging jalan ini sudah kami kembalikan ke tagging awal
#> 16 Obchodní ulice není součástí silnice II/215. A to podle žádné národní databáze, GIS portálu Plzně ani značení v terénu. A pokud jde o průběh městského okruhu, ten je plánovaný právě Folmavskou ulicí, minimálně podle závazného územního plánu. Odkud berete tyto úpravy?
#> 17 OK, thanks for keeping a watchful eye out. Retagged as riding arena.\n\nSekeRob
#> 18 Данные объекты не помечаются как place=hamlet.
#> 19 the same applies to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5581534 group - right?
#> 20 Might just be me, but I personally find this mapping style extremely ugly (not to mention wrong!), and am therefore very irritated when @vectorial8192 applies it everywhere. For horrors, look at Tin Shui Wai.
#> 21 Unusual indeed. Do you happen to have any pictures of this situation? Perfectly fine if not, of course.
#> 22 Hi there, this changeset modified https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296724539 in such a way that the train tracks are no longer inside the station, which is obviously wrong. Perhaps you might want to recheck this changeset?
#> 23 Hola Diego. gracias por tus ediciones. Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos.\nsaludos\n ---\n \n Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190535534\n
#> 24 Ini kan sebenarnya sudah highway=track. Jadi seharusnya tinggal mesin routing Gojek saja yang diatur untuk tidak menggunakan highway=track. Terlebih, jika ada tag akses kendaraan roda empat atau lebih tidak bisa lewat, ini harusnya diganti jadi highway=path.\n\nYang menggunakan Openstreetmap kan bukan cuma aplikasi ojol. 👎
#> 25 Thank you Rab I will check it out\n
#> 26 Vielen Dank für deine Arbeit beim Anlegen von Äckern und Wiesen. Nur eine Bitte: Die Flächen nicht an die Straßen kleben. Ich habe das früher auch gemacht, weil es mir logisch erschien, mache das aber aus gutem Grund nicht mehr.\n\nIch habe einen Teil bereits gelöst, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190547184\n\nStattdessen füge ich immer landuse=highway hinzu. Wiki sagt, man soll das leer lassen, ich füge das hinzu, weil maschinell entfernen und umtaggen kann man immer noch, maschinell hinzufügen aber nicht.
#> 27 Det ska inte finnas flera ställen med järnvägsstationstaggar.\nDu gjorde detta för 10 dagar sedan. Jag kommenterade det men du har inte svarat. Jag tar bort det ännu en gång.\nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190018739
#> 28 Perhaps, providing a translation of local language would help? In this case adding bahasa Indonesia....\n\n---\n\nHalo Bagas, mohon untuk tidak memetakan bangunan menjadi rangkap ya. Beberapa perubahanmu telah dipulihkan. Mohon pelajari lagi tutorial menggunakan JOSM. Jika ada pertanyaan, kamu bisa tanyakan melalui komunitas kita di Telegram atau Facebook.
#> 29 Olá\nOs vértices geodésicos não devem ser alterados pois são elementos fundamentais para o alinhamento das imagens aéreas.\nSe eles assentam numa torre de água, acrescentamos a torre sem alterar o VG.\nConsegues repor os valores anteriores e criar os elementos onde eles assentam?\nLuis
#> 30 Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190546584
#> 31 Do you have any source on why is this road tagged as foot/cyclist path instead of residental road?
#> 32 Jokių problemų, sėkmės!
#> 33 ALE PRZEPRASZAM BARDZO TO JEST AKURAT REALNE MIEJSCE, POLECAM POJECHAĆ NA MIEJSCE I SPRAWDZIĆ O ILE CIEBIE TAM WPUSZCZĄ BO TO POWAŻNE PRZEDSIĘBIORSTWO GDZIE TAKICH PIWNICZAKÓW JAK TY NIE WPUSZCZAJĄ NIE MUSICIE SPRAWDZAĆ JA DODAJĘ MIEJSCA KTÓRE ZNAM I W KTÓRYCH BYŁEM A JAK KTOŚ WYCOFA TO BĘDZIEMY DODAWAĆ DO SKUTKU ZOBACZYMY KOMU SIĘ PIERWSZEMU ZNUDZI!!!
#> 34 Terima kasih atas penjelasannya, lain kali saya akan memeriksa citra Esri!
#> 35 I see. Indeed, I focus on "minor (specifically, inaccessible to most) destinations". Whether the destination has anything to do with the road itself is not a concern. Why do you think IVE not being a highway auxiliary facility makes it major?
#> 36 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190545491
#> 37 Good morning! I am sorry if I came across a bit annoyed, I wasn't. I was just going to bed and as such might not have been as polite as I should have been. I felt I had to send a message before I went to bed though, because I maintain a feed of changes in Wales and you were making more changesets than people do in the span on a month so my feed was basically just you (which was quite amusing to be fair).\n\nDon't worry, your changes are much appreciated, and addresses and access are quite common and important issues to resolve. In general, adding the address to the house, and including the path to the house (with `access=private`, you don't have to specify specific modes of transport since this is implied), should be sufficient. If you want to map the entrance you can do that as well, but it should be a node on the building tagged as `entrance=main`. The entrance itself doesn't need address tags (unless the address differs from the rest of the building, e.g. for terraces) since that is implied by the building.\n\nSetting `access=no` will prevent any software from ever routing to it, including delivery drivers etc, since that implies they can't go down that road even with the permission of the owner. Settings the paths to `access=private` will help with that.\n\nI assume both of the speed limits on the roads were added by accident?\n\nThank you for responding :)
#> 38 Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190545193
#> 39 Hm? The places I had put on? \nThose places are where I go almost everyday, going from home to school, and from school to home. If you mean like I had put a lot of things or made some mistake. I apologize for that, I was just testing the map and trying to understand how it worked.
#> 40 Ist es wirklich sonnntags geöffnet? Laut Facebook\nMontag GESCHLOSSEN\nDienstag GESCHLOSSEN\nMittwoch GESCHLOSSEN\nDonnerstag 09:30 - 13:00, 15:00 - 18:00\nFreitag 15:00 - 18:00\nSamstag 14:00 - 17:00\nSonntag GESCHLOSSEN
#> 41 fake, reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190544916
#> 42 Mechanische und Gleisbildstellwerke hatten und haben Namen wie "Schöndorf Sf" oder "Wiesen Ww". Da steckt auch ein wenig von der Funktion mit drin. Die Bezeichnungen werden aber tatsächlich als Name gebraucht. Und so ist es auf die Elekronischen Stellwerke übergegangen. Tatsächlich wird auch sogar in der gesprochenen Sprache vom Stellwerk "Heinhausen ESTW-UZ" geredet. Ist also fast "Nur der Name". :)
#> 43 Thank you, I understand which source you are using now. However, I still have doubts about its accuracy in this particular case. Of course, neither of us can simply drop everything and go out to check these buoys right now, but:\n\n1. They are not visible in the current imagery.\n2. I provided a link to the original Korean notice stating that they had been removed. At the very least, the names and coordinates match exactly.\n\nCould you please double-check this particular case? I have a personal interest in ensuring that this area is mapped accurately, and for now, I remain convinced that these buoys are no longer there. I hope this is not too much to ask, given your expertise in mapping these features.
#> 44 Anyhow, if you will not do any follow-up, then I will just pretend this discussion has never existed. I/we have more interesting things to focus on.
#> 45 Okey, šito nežinojau, ačiū
#> 46 Gali būti, tiesiog tai oficialios kelių centro linijos, tai jas tada reikia keisti į highway=proposed, kad jos liktų. Nes te greta yra suskirstyti adresai, kuriuos QA iš karto aptinka kaip probleminius, nes nebėra atitinkamų gatvių. (Aš dabar pataisiau)
#> 47 apologies for missing the source:\nhttps://www.cbc.gov.tw/tw/dl-122101-7EF180327222410BACEAAACA2AEEFF66.html
#> 48 This looks like vandalism and has been reverted.
#> 49 Ten, kur ištryniau, pati neseniai važiavau, tai tų kelių tiesiog ten nėra, arba jie už vartų privačioj žemėj
#> 50 I checked again the description in the official IRP inventory https://inventairepatrimoine.wallonie.be/fr/inventaire-regional-du-patrimoine/fiche/53053-INV-0112-02. What is important for the castle’s current appearance is not only the original beginning date in the 14th century but also its rebuilt after being demolished in the 16th century. That is why I entered both centuries, C14 and C16, for start_date
#> 51 Danke für Deinen Tipp. Ich überdenke das mit der Quellenangabe noch einmal. Auf alle Fälle weiß das STALU, wie der Bach wirklich heißt . .\nGruß Tino
#> 52 * Standard Charted: relocated to new site\n* KGI Bank: relocated to Standard Charted former site\n* Eti Pets: new open at KGI former site
#> 53 Thanks for adding the REX4. As far as I understand on the Pyhrnbahn there is now the S4, the REX4 and the IRs as well as some D train on Friday/Sunday. However, the R140 is outdated (see Relation: R140: Linz <=> Selzthal (10698655)). Therefore I suggest we remove it, correct?
#> 54 Ok, kind of didn't expect them to cut off bicycle access on both streets that way without an alternative.
#> 55 Looks good to me 🫡
#> 56 Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190539392
#> 57 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190539178
#> 58 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190536408
#> 59 Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190543051
#> 60 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190513686
#> 61 Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190512682
#> 62 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190512110
#> 63 Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190510442
#> 64 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190501260
#> 65 Alles klar. Danke für den Hinweis. Hab es angepasst.
#> 66 There's no need to delete `=footway`
#> 67 A highway may have auxiliary facilities, such as the admin building(s). These are attached to the highway by having service roads reach them.\n\nIVE Campus here is obviously not the case.\n\n@kingkingHK you may perhaps simplify your words into "minor destinations do not affect classifications". You anchor on "this is a minor destination" and I insist on "this is a major destination". Does the above summarize this exchange?
#> 68 @kingkingHK I would simply ignore the user for being newly created to a lower precision. Elsewhere, sometimes the stop-line is not at the island's cap, then those would be relatively/topologically correct, absolute-wise / coordinates inaccurate.
#> 69 Hello. Thanks for your message. I am new to the comunity and have taken your coments on board.\n\nThe address issue stems from the wrong directions being given on multiple mapping software. My workaround was to posistion the address nearer to the correct road access.\n\nI will update with the changes you recomend.\n\nThanks
#> 70 Oh, sorry, I was just surfing through the maps and did not notice I was in Indonesia.
#> 71 Na ja...\nWenn du das Papier als Quelle angibst:\nhttps://www.stalu-mv.de/Service/Impressum/\nPunkt 3. ...\nDas Papier hat eine GmbH erstellt.\nMit solchen Sachen bin ich immer vorsichtig. Ich weiß, solche Namen unterliegen keinem Urheberrecht, aber da als Quelle angeben, ist rechtlich zumindest umstritten.
#> 72 I added these 2 buoys (3549.10 and 3549.11) by referring Notice to Mariners (Vol. 23 of 2025) published by Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic Agency on June 6th 2025, and there are no updates about these 2 buoys in Notice to Mariners afterwards.
#> 73 Also, if you are trying to say that I am actively disrupting discussion because I am not reading past changeset comments, then I have to tell you, perhaps you are gravely misunderstanding something.\n\nPast changeset comments are hidden behind several layers of navigation, it is unreasonable to believe that past changeset comments are supposed to be widespread quotable. I cannot be held responsible for "not reading them". Put the stuff onto the Wiki. The so-called "concerns" seems unfounded and malicious.
#> 74 `commercial=no` is added as an alternative to `abutters=residential` for no mixing as `landuse=commercial`
#> 75 Sorry, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35916401 hätte nicht in diesem Changeset landen sollen!
#> 76 Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!\nSchön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.\n\nHier hast du das Kosmetikstudio ausserhalb des Gebäudes bewegt, ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190541836 korrigiert.\n\nGruss, Habi\n\nPS: Bei irgendwelchen Fragen gerne hier in den Kommentaren nachhaken oder bei https://c.osm.org/c/107 eine Diskussion eröffnen, wir versuchen gerne zu helfen
#> 77 Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
#> 78 I see the issue is somehow resolved.\n\nAlternatively, consider the fact that, the "blue dead end T" sign is not applicable here, so if the government needs to tell people "this road doesn't bring you to another district", then the next best sign is just access=destination . This is what I mean by "consequence of another active restriction", albeit quite physical this time because the road really doesn't bring you out of Sha Tau Kok.\n\nI shall stand my ground, but have decided to not do any follow-up. Whether this signage actually exists irl is ultimately irrelevant. Much prefer to not indicate access=destination .
#> 79 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190500770
#> 80 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190496055
#> 81 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190486806
#> 82 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190486555
#> 83 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190486258
#> 84 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190485386
#> 85 Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190485223
#> 86 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190484884
#> 87 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190484381
#> 88 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190440092
#> 89 Hey! I saw that you have a lot of changes with reviews requested. I'll take a look at them in more detail over the next few days if someone else doesn't before I do, but as for your addition in this changeset, the Pack River waterway is only the river itself. Considering how the sort of lake, sort of river body of water is in the golf course (wouldn't surprise me if it was man-made), I would delete the river fragment that you added and add a water trap there instead.
#> 90 Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190439748
#> 91 Per impostare bicycle=no, hai visto segnali di divieto specifico?
#> 92 Da habe ich nicht daran geachtet. Dann ist natürlich die Abstraktion auf zwei Wegweiser besser.\nMagst du den Änderungssatz revertieren. \nIch befürchte, dass ich die nächsten Tage nicht dazu kommen werde.\nVG Uwe
#> 93 Should be 15 m to the South East at #157\n\nCan this be changed?
#> 94 Na bet negerai, ištrinta ir dalis realios gatvių infrastruktūros. Su pavadinimai kelių negalima taip tiesiog trinti.
#> 95 Tagging der Brücke möglicherweise nicht korrekt. Siehe hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5581276
#> 96 Hi could you please double check this changeset? it broke the Huston relation (returns 404 in nominatim) https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=2688911
#> 97 That means prohibited on carriageways only. `=use_sidepath` exactly means pedestrian must use a nearby walkway. And the data has to consider routing on `highway=tertiary` without `footway=crossing` for simplified databases.
#> 98 Dużo z tych kresek nie jest grzbietami gór. \nDla przykładu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1559936044 jeśli już to powinno przebiegać mniej więcej wzdłuż osi wyznaczonej przez Czosnkową Drogę ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189179832 ). Nie wspominając już o różnych odnogach. Tak samo bardzo kontrowersyjne jest umieszczanie grzbietów na płaskim terenie. Dla przejrzystości komentarza podsyłam pomocne linki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:natural=ridge?uselang=pl https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grzbiet_g%C3%B3rski
#> 99 Здраствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, почему вы удалили отношение? \n \nhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21620899/history
#> 100 Hej, odcinek Mazowieckiej jednak cały czas rozkopany jest
# Search for changeset comments by a specific user:
osm_search_comment_changeset_discussion(user = "Steve", format = "json")
#> $version
#> [1] "0.6"
#>
#> $generator
#> [1] "OpenStreetMap server"
#>
#> $copyright
#> [1] "OpenStreetMap and contributors"
#>
#> $attribution
#> [1] "http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright"
#>
#> $license
#> [1] "http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1-0/"
#>
#> $comments
#> $comments[[1]]
#> $comments[[1]]$id
#> [1] 664366
#>
#> $comments[[1]]$visible
#> [1] TRUE
#>
#> $comments[[1]]$date
#> [1] "2021-02-25T19:31:46Z"
#>
#> $comments[[1]]$uid
#> [1] 1
#>
#> $comments[[1]]$user
#> [1] "Steve"
#>
#> $comments[[1]]$text
#> [1] "woo!"
#>
#>
#>
# Search for changeset comments between January 1st and January 2nd, 2015:
osm_search_comment_changeset_discussion(from = "2015-01-01", to = "2015-01-02", format = "xml")
#> {xml_document}
#> <osm version="0.6" generator="OpenStreetMap server" copyright="OpenStreetMap and contributors" attribution="http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright" license="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1-0/">
#> [1] <comment id="3597" date="2015-01-01T23:41:30Z" visible="true" uid="10915 ...
#> [2] <comment id="3596" date="2015-01-01T23:36:36Z" visible="true" uid="88164 ...
#> [3] <comment id="3595" date="2015-01-01T23:29:40Z" visible="true" uid="88164 ...
#> [4] <comment id="3594" date="2015-01-01T23:24:27Z" visible="true" uid="61942 ...
#> [5] <comment id="3593" date="2015-01-01T23:19:58Z" visible="true" uid="88164 ...
#> [6] <comment id="3592" date="2015-01-01T23:15:54Z" visible="true" uid="23858 ...
#> [7] <comment id="3591" date="2015-01-01T23:15:38Z" visible="true" uid="39688 ...
#> [8] <comment id="3590" date="2015-01-01T23:12:25Z" visible="true" uid="61942 ...
#> [9] <comment id="3589" date="2015-01-01T22:23:35Z" visible="true" uid="61942 ...
#> [10] <comment id="3588" date="2015-01-01T22:14:08Z" visible="true" uid="61942 ...
#> [11] <comment id="3587" date="2015-01-01T21:53:43Z" visible="true" uid="18850 ...
#> [12] <comment id="3586" date="2015-01-01T21:53:40Z" visible="true" uid="61942 ...
#> [13] <comment id="3585" date="2015-01-01T21:29:38Z" visible="true" uid="33121 ...
#> [14] <comment id="3584" date="2015-01-01T20:30:27Z" visible="true" uid="25485 ...
#> [15] <comment id="3583" date="2015-01-01T19:49:08Z" visible="true" uid="23858 ...
#> [16] <comment id="3582" date="2015-01-01T19:40:03Z" visible="true" uid="12992 ...
#> [17] <comment id="3581" date="2015-01-01T19:39:16Z" visible="true" uid="12992 ...
#> [18] <comment id="3580" date="2015-01-01T17:53:47Z" visible="true" uid="13112 ...
#> [19] <comment id="3579" date="2015-01-01T16:35:02Z" visible="true" uid="10915 ...
#> [20] <comment id="3578" date="2015-01-01T16:23:43Z" visible="true" uid="61942 ...
#> ...