Specify and fit joint model using count data from traditional surveys and eDNA PCR data
Source:R/joint_model.R
joint_model.Rd
This function implements a Bayesian model that integrates data from paired
eDNA and traditional surveys, as described in Keller et al. (2022)
<doi.org/10.1002/eap.2561>. The model estimates parameters including
the expected species catch rate and the probability of false positive eDNA
detection. This function allows for optional model variations, like inclusion
of site-level covariates that scale the sensitivity of eDNA sampling relative
to traditional sampling, as well as estimation of gear scaling coefficients
that scales the relative catchability of multiple traditional gear types.
Model is implemented using Bayesian inference using the rstan
package,
which uses Hamiltonian Monte Carlo to simulate the posterior distributions.
See more examples in the
Package
Vignette.
Usage
joint_model(
data,
cov = NULL,
family = "poisson",
p10_priors = c(1, 20),
q = FALSE,
phi_priors = NULL,
multicore = FALSE,
initial_values = NULL,
n_chain = 4,
n_warmup = 500,
n_iter = 3000,
thin = 1,
adapt_delta = 0.9,
verbose = TRUE,
seed = NULL
)
Arguments
- data
A list containing data necessary for model fitting. Valid tags are
pcr_n
,pcr_k
,count
,count_type
, andsite_cov
.pcr_n
andpcr_k
are matrices or data frames with first dimension equal to the number of sites (i) and second dimension equal to the maximum number of eDNA samples at a given site (m).pcr_n
contains the total number of PCR replicates per site and eDNA sample, andpcr_k
contains the total number of positive PCR detections per site and eDNA sample.count
is a matrix or data frame of traditional survey count data, with first dimension equal to the number of sites (i) and second dimension equal to the maximum number of traditional survey replicates at a given site (j).count_type
is an optional matrix or data frame of integers indicating gear type used in corresponding count data, with first dimension equal to the number of sites (i) and second dimension equal to the maximum number of traditional survey replicates at a given site. Values should be integers beginning with 1 (referring to the first gear type) to n (last gear type).site_cov
is an optional matrix or data frame of site-level covariate data, with first dimension equal to the number of sites (i).site_cov
should include informative column names. Empty cells should be NA and will be removed during processing. Sites, i, should be consistent in all PCR, count, and site covariate data.- cov
A character vector indicating the site-level covariates to include in the model. Default value is NULL.
- family
The distribution class used to model traditional survey count data. Options include poisson ('poisson'), negative binomial ('negbin'), and gamma ('gamma'). Default value is 'poisson'.
- p10_priors
A numeric vector indicating beta distribution hyperparameters (alpha, beta) used as the prior distribution for the eDNA false positive probability (p10). Default vector is c(1,20).
- q
A logical value indicating whether to estimate gear scaling coefficients, q, for traditional survey gear types (TRUE) or to not estimate gear scaling coefficients, q, for traditional survey gear types (FALSE). Default value is FALSE.
- phi_priors
A numeric vector indicating gamma distribution hyperparameters (shape, rate) used as the prior distribution for phi, the overdispersion in the negative binomial distribution for traditional survey gear data. Used when family = 'negbin.' If family = 'negbin', then default vector is c(0.25,0.25), otherwise, default is NULL.
- multicore
A logical value indicating whether to parallelize chains with multiple cores. Default is FALSE.
- initial_values
A list of lists of initial values to use in MCMC. The length should equal the number of MCMC chains. Initial values can be provided for parameters: beta, p10 (log-scale), mu, q, alpha. If no initial values are provided, default random values are drawn.
- n_chain
Number of MCMC chains. Default value is 4.
- n_warmup
A positive integer specifying the number of warm-up MCMC iterations. Default value is 500.
- n_iter
A positive integer specifying the number of iterations for each chain (including warmup). Default value is 3000.
- thin
A positive integer specifying the period for saving samples. Default value is 1.
- adapt_delta
Numeric value between 0 and 1 indicating target average acceptance probability used in
rstan::sampling
. Default value is 0.9.- verbose
Logical value controlling the verbosity of output (i.e., warnings, messages, progress bar). Default is TRUE.
- seed
A positive integer seed used for random number generation in MCMC. Default is NULL, which means the seed is generated from 1 to the maximum integer supported by R.
Value
A list of:
a model object of class
stanfit
returned byrstan::sampling
initial values used in MCMC
Note
Before fitting the model, this function checks to ensure that the model specification is possible given the data files. These checks include:
All tags in data are valid (i.e., include pcr_n, pcr_k, count, count_type, and site_cov).
Dimensions of pcr_n and pcr_k are equal, and dimensions of count and count_type are equal (if count_type provided).
Number of sites in PCR and count data are equal.
All data are numeric (i.e., integer or NA).
Empty data cells (NA) match in pcr_n and pcr_k and in count and count_type.
family is either 'poisson', 'negbin', or 'gamma'.
p10_priors and phi_priors (if used) is a vector of two numeric values.
site_cov has same number of rows as pcr_n and count, if present
site_cov is numeric, if present
cov values match column names in site_cov, if present
If any of these checks fail, the function returns an error message.
Examples
# \donttest{
# Ex. 1: Implementing the joint model
# Load data
data(goby_data)
# Examine data in list
names(goby_data)
#> [1] "pcr_n" "pcr_k" "count" "site_cov"
# Note that the surveyed sites (rows) should match in all data
dim(goby_data$pcr_n)[1]
#> [1] 39
dim(goby_data$count)[1]
#> [1] 39
# Fit a basic model with paired eDNA and traditional survey data.
# Count data is modeled using a poisson distribution.
fit <- joint_model(data = goby_data, family = "poisson",
p10_priors = c(1, 20),
multicore = FALSE)
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 1).
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Gradient evaluation took 5e-05 seconds
#> Chain 1: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.5 seconds.
#> Chain 1: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Elapsed Time: 0.904 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 1: 1.666 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: 2.57 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 1:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 2).
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Gradient evaluation took 4.4e-05 seconds
#> Chain 2: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.44 seconds.
#> Chain 2: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Elapsed Time: 0.943 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 2: 1.678 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: 2.621 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 2:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 3).
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Gradient evaluation took 4.3e-05 seconds
#> Chain 3: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.43 seconds.
#> Chain 3: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Elapsed Time: 0.961 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 3: 1.695 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: 2.656 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 3:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 4).
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Gradient evaluation took 4.4e-05 seconds
#> Chain 4: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.44 seconds.
#> Chain 4: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Elapsed Time: 0.882 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 4: 1.656 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: 2.538 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 4:
#> Refer to the eDNAjoint guide for visualization tips: https://ednajoint.netlify.app/tips#visualization-tips
# Ex. 2: Implementing the joint model with site-level covariates
# With the same data, fit a model including 'Filter_time' and 'Salinity'
# site-level covariates
# These covariates will scale the sensitivity of eDNA sampling relative to
# traditional surveys
# Count data is modeled using a poisson distribution.
fit_cov <- joint_model(data = goby_data, cov = c('Filter_time','Salinity'),
family = "poisson", p10_priors = c(1, 20),
multicore = FALSE)
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 1).
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Gradient evaluation took 5.1e-05 seconds
#> Chain 1: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.51 seconds.
#> Chain 1: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Elapsed Time: 0.887 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 1: 1.702 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: 2.589 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 1:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 2).
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Gradient evaluation took 4.4e-05 seconds
#> Chain 2: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.44 seconds.
#> Chain 2: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Elapsed Time: 4.833 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 2: 1.65 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: 6.483 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 2:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 3).
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Gradient evaluation took 4.4e-05 seconds
#> Chain 3: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.44 seconds.
#> Chain 3: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Elapsed Time: 0.636 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 3: 1.652 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: 2.288 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 3:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 4).
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Gradient evaluation took 4.4e-05 seconds
#> Chain 4: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.44 seconds.
#> Chain 4: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Elapsed Time: 0.905 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 4: 1.681 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: 2.586 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 4:
#> Refer to the eDNAjoint guide for visualization tips: https://ednajoint.netlify.app/tips#visualization-tips
# Ex. 3: Implementing the joint model with multiple traditional gear types
# Load data
data(green_crab_data)
# Examine data in list
names(green_crab_data)
#> [1] "pcr_n" "pcr_k" "count" "count_type"
# Note that the surveyed sites (rows) should match in all data
dim(green_crab_data$pcr_n)[1]
#> [1] 20
dim(green_crab_data$count)[1]
#> [1] 20
# Fit a model estimating a gear scaling coefficient for traditional survey
# gear types.
# This model does not assume all traditional survey methods have the same
# catchability.
# Count data is modeled using a negative binomial distribution.
fit_q <- joint_model(data = green_crab_data, cov = NULL, family = "negbin",
p10_priors = c(1, 20), q = TRUE,
phi_priors = c(0.25, 0.25),
multicore = FALSE, initial_values = NULL,
n_chain = 4, n_warmup = 500,
n_iter = 3000, thin = 1, adapt_delta = 0.9,
verbose = TRUE, seed = 123)
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 1).
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Gradient evaluation took 0.000332 seconds
#> Chain 1: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 3.32 seconds.
#> Chain 1: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Elapsed Time: 3.721 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 1: 9.678 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: 13.399 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 1:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 2).
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Gradient evaluation took 0.00037 seconds
#> Chain 2: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 3.7 seconds.
#> Chain 2: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Elapsed Time: 3.808 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 2: 8.504 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: 12.312 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 2:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 3).
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Gradient evaluation took 0.000363 seconds
#> Chain 3: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 3.63 seconds.
#> Chain 3: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Elapsed Time: 3.965 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 3: 12.513 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: 16.478 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 3:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 4).
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Gradient evaluation took 0.000361 seconds
#> Chain 4: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 3.61 seconds.
#> Chain 4: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Elapsed Time: 3.844 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 4: 10.34 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: 14.184 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 4:
#> Refer to the eDNAjoint guide for visualization tips: https://ednajoint.netlify.app/tips#visualization-tips
# }