
Plot the survey effort necessary to detect species presence, given the species expected catch rate.
Source:R/detection_plot.R
detection_plot.Rd
This function plots the number of survey effort units to necessary detect species presence, calculated using median estimated parameter values from joint_model(). Detecting species presence is defined as producing at least one true positive eDNA detection or catching at least one individual. See more examples in the Package Vignette.
Arguments
- model_fit
An object of class
stanfit
.- mu_min
A value indicating the minimum expected species catch rate for plotting. If multiple traditional gear types are represented in the model, mu is the catch rate of gear type 1.
- mu_max
A value indicating the maximum expected species catch rate for plotting. If multiple traditional gear types are represented in the model, mu is the catch rate of gear type 1.
- cov_val
A numeric vector indicating the values of site-level covariates to use for prediction. Default is NULL.
- probability
A numeric value indicating the probability of detecting presence. The default is 0.9.
- pcr_n
An integer indicating the number of PCR replicates per eDNA sample. The default is 3.
Value
A plot displaying survey efforts necessary to detect species presence, given mu, for each survey type.
Note
Before fitting the model, this function checks to ensure that the function is possible given the inputs. These checks include:
Input model fit is an object of class 'stanfit'.
Input mu_min is a numeric value greater than 0.
Input mu_max is a numeric value.
If model fit contains alpha, cov_val must be provided.
Input cov_val is numeric.
Input cov_val is the same length as the number of estimated covariates.
Input probability is a univariate numeric value.
Input model fit has converged (i.e. no divergent transitions after warm-up).
If any of these checks fail, the function returns an error message.
Examples
# \donttest{
# Ex. 1: Calculating necessary effort for detection with site-level
# covariates
# Load data
data(goby_data)
# Fit a model including 'Filter_time' and 'Salinity' site-level covariates
fit_cov <- joint_model(data = goby_data, cov = c('Filter_time','Salinity'),
family = "poisson", p10_priors = c(1,20), q = FALSE,
multicore = FALSE)
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 1).
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Gradient evaluation took 5.1e-05 seconds
#> Chain 1: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.51 seconds.
#> Chain 1: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Elapsed Time: 0.876 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 1: 1.625 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: 2.501 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 1:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 2).
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Gradient evaluation took 4.5e-05 seconds
#> Chain 2: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.45 seconds.
#> Chain 2: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Elapsed Time: 0.855 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 2: 1.639 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: 2.494 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 2:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 3).
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Gradient evaluation took 4.9e-05 seconds
#> Chain 3: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.49 seconds.
#> Chain 3: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Elapsed Time: 1.124 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 3: 91.492 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: 92.616 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 3:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 4).
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Gradient evaluation took 5.3e-05 seconds
#> Chain 4: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.53 seconds.
#> Chain 4: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Elapsed Time: 0.796 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 4: 1.665 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: 2.461 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 4:
#> Warning: There were 199 divergent transitions after warmup. See
#> https://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#divergent-transitions-after-warmup
#> to find out why this is a problem and how to eliminate them.
#> Warning: There were 2301 transitions after warmup that exceeded the maximum treedepth. Increase max_treedepth above 10. See
#> https://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#maximum-treedepth-exceeded
#> Warning: There were 1 chains where the estimated Bayesian Fraction of Missing Information was low. See
#> https://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#bfmi-low
#> Warning: Examine the pairs() plot to diagnose sampling problems
#> Warning: The largest R-hat is 1.06, indicating chains have not mixed.
#> Running the chains for more iterations may help. See
#> https://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#r-hat
#> Warning: Bulk Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low, indicating posterior means and medians may be unreliable.
#> Running the chains for more iterations may help. See
#> https://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#bulk-ess
#> Warning: Tail Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low, indicating posterior variances and tail quantiles may be unreliable.
#> Running the chains for more iterations may help. See
#> https://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#tail-ess
#> Refer to the eDNAjoint guide for visualization tips: https://ednajoint.netlify.app/tips#visualization-tips
# Plot at the mean covariate values (covariates are standardized, so mean=0)
detection_plot(fit_cov$model, mu_min = 0.1, mu_max = 1,
cov_val = c(0,0), pcr_n = 3)
# Calculate mu_critical at salinity 0.5 z-scores greater than the mean
detection_plot(fit_cov$model, mu_min = 0.1, mu_max = 1, cov_val = c(0,0.5),
pcr_n = 3)
# Ex. 2: Calculating necessary effort for detection with multiple
# traditional gear types
# Load data
data(green_crab_data)
# Fit a model with no site-level covariates
fit_q <- joint_model(data = green_crab_data, cov = NULL, family = "negbin",
p10_priors = c(1,20), q = TRUE,
multicore = FALSE)
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 1).
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Gradient evaluation took 0.000352 seconds
#> Chain 1: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 3.52 seconds.
#> Chain 1: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 1:
#> Chain 1: Elapsed Time: 3.816 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 1: 12.176 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: 15.992 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 1:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 2).
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Gradient evaluation took 0.000317 seconds
#> Chain 2: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 3.17 seconds.
#> Chain 2: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 2:
#> Chain 2: Elapsed Time: 3.473 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 2: 11.621 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: 15.094 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 2:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 3).
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Gradient evaluation took 0.000311 seconds
#> Chain 3: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 3.11 seconds.
#> Chain 3: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 3:
#> Chain 3: Elapsed Time: 3.911 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 3: 10.406 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: 14.317 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 3:
#>
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'joint_count' NOW (CHAIN 4).
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Gradient evaluation took 0.000338 seconds
#> Chain 4: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 3.38 seconds.
#> Chain 4: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1 / 3000 [ 0%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 500 / 3000 [ 16%] (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 501 / 3000 [ 16%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1000 / 3000 [ 33%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1500 / 3000 [ 50%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 2000 / 3000 [ 66%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 2500 / 3000 [ 83%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 3000 / 3000 [100%] (Sampling)
#> Chain 4:
#> Chain 4: Elapsed Time: 3.823 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 4: 10.254 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: 14.077 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 4:
#> Refer to the eDNAjoint guide for visualization tips: https://ednajoint.netlify.app/tips#visualization-tips
# Calculate
detection_plot(fit_q$model, mu_min = 0.1, mu_max = 1,
cov_val = NULL, pcr_n = 3)
# Change probability of detecting presence to 0.95
detection_plot(fit_q$model, mu_min = 0.1, mu_max = 1, cov_val = NULL,
probability = 0.95, pcr_n = 3)
# }