Performance

Eunseop Kim

All the tests were done on an Arch Linux x86_64 machine with an Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU (1.90GHz).

Empirical likelihood computation

We show the performance of computing empirical likelihood with el_mean(). We test the computation speed with simulated data sets in two different settings: 1) the number of observations increases with the number of parameters fixed, and 2) the number of parameters increases with the number of observations fixed.

Increasing the number of observations

We fix the number of parameters at $p = 10$, and simulate the parameter value and $n \times p$ matrices using rnorm(). In order to ensure convergence with a large $n$, we set a large threshold value using el_control().

library(ggplot2)
library(microbenchmark)
set.seed(3175775)
p <- 10
par <- rnorm(p, sd = 0.1)
ctrl <- el_control(th = 1e+10)
result <- microbenchmark(
  n1e2 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(100 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl),
  n1e3 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(1000 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl),
  n1e4 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(10000 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl),
  n1e5 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(100000 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl)
)

Below are the results:

result
#> Unit: microseconds
#>  expr        min         lq        mean      median         uq        max neval
#>  n1e2    448.677    480.662    591.7116    499.8985    556.669   5545.771   100
#>  n1e3   1228.994   1412.166   2370.5008   1501.5980   1655.676  72259.356   100
#>  n1e4  10755.636  13064.676  14641.2719  15019.3795  15905.578  21104.763   100
#>  n1e5 169456.759 205410.639 240590.4649 229528.4960 272611.157 323465.213   100
#>  cld
#>  a  
#>  a  
#>   b 
#>    c
autoplot(result)

Increasing the number of parameters

This time we fix the number of observations at $n = 1000$, and evaluate empirical likelihood at zero vectors of different sizes.

n <- 1000
result2 <- microbenchmark(
  p5 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 5), ncol = 5),
    par = rep(0, 5),
    control = ctrl
  ),
  p25 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 25), ncol = 25),
    par = rep(0, 25),
    control = ctrl
  ),
  p100 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 100), ncol = 100),
    par = rep(0, 100),
    control = ctrl
  ),
  p400 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 400), ncol = 400),
    par = rep(0, 400),
    control = ctrl
  )
)

result2
#> Unit: microseconds
#>  expr        min         lq        mean     median          uq        max neval
#>    p5    727.527    760.815    802.0628    793.957    835.1085    923.834   100
#>   p25   2883.723   2929.708   3137.5955   2964.012   3026.5440   8346.509   100
#>  p100  23291.976  25852.831  28142.1373  26614.037  30752.3760  45690.544   100
#>  p400 266415.949 290688.834 325609.4049 312039.818 351201.3545 450710.553   100
#>  cld
#>  a  
#>  a  
#>   b 
#>    c
autoplot(result2)

On average, evaluating empirical likelihood with a 100000×10 or 1000×400 matrix at a parameter value satisfying the convex hull constraint takes less than a second.