Performance

Eunseop Kim

All the tests were done on an Arch Linux x86_64 machine with an Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU (1.90GHz).

Empirical likelihood computation

We show the performance of computing empirical likelihood with el_mean(). We test the computation speed with simulated data sets in two different settings: 1) the number of observations increases with the number of parameters fixed, and 2) the number of parameters increases with the number of observations fixed.

Increasing the number of observations

We fix the number of parameters at $p = 10$, and simulate the parameter value and $n \times p$ matrices using rnorm(). In order to ensure convergence with a large $n$, we set a large threshold value using el_control().

library(ggplot2)
library(microbenchmark)
set.seed(3175775)
p <- 10
par <- rnorm(p, sd = 0.1)
ctrl <- el_control(th = 1e+10)
result <- microbenchmark(
  n1e2 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(100 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl),
  n1e3 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(1000 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl),
  n1e4 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(10000 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl),
  n1e5 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(100000 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl)
)

Below are the results:

result
#> Unit: microseconds
#>  expr        min          lq        mean     median         uq        max neval
#>  n1e2    436.735    465.0225    502.8936    480.812    542.928    843.073   100
#>  n1e3   1134.407   1355.1685   1460.8349   1425.409   1531.273   2546.661   100
#>  n1e4  10471.306  12608.6385  15814.0579  14790.614  15631.764  91007.641   100
#>  n1e5 158884.577 202067.3070 240021.9878 243431.840 271673.720 338583.196   100
#>  cld
#>  a  
#>  a  
#>   b 
#>    c
autoplot(result)

Increasing the number of parameters

This time we fix the number of observations at $n = 1000$, and evaluate empirical likelihood at zero vectors of different sizes.

n <- 1000
result2 <- microbenchmark(
  p5 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 5), ncol = 5),
    par = rep(0, 5),
    control = ctrl
  ),
  p25 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 25), ncol = 25),
    par = rep(0, 25),
    control = ctrl
  ),
  p100 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 100), ncol = 100),
    par = rep(0, 100),
    control = ctrl
  ),
  p400 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 400), ncol = 400),
    par = rep(0, 400),
    control = ctrl
  )
)

result2
#> Unit: microseconds
#>  expr        min          lq        mean     median          uq        max
#>    p5    709.313    742.9255    869.0745    773.518    813.0065   3942.856
#>   p25   2710.086   2759.2780   2925.6140   2784.164   2853.3790   5829.746
#>  p100  21089.847  23618.7200  25835.1865  24241.311  28653.7635  46392.544
#>  p400 236172.140 261685.7810 295799.2108 282959.897 317499.3360 472354.260
#>  neval cld
#>    100 a  
#>    100 a  
#>    100  b 
#>    100   c
autoplot(result2)

On average, evaluating empirical likelihood with a 100000×10 or 1000×400 matrix at a parameter value satisfying the convex hull constraint takes less than a second.