This document provides an overview of the inner workings of unifir, focusing on how scripts, props, and actions work together to produce a Unity scene. The tone and focus here are going to be extremely technical and fiddly; for a friendlier introduction to unifir 101 - A user’s guide.
At a high level, unifir operates around the idea of a script
object, a container that stores all the parameters and instructions you
want to run through Unity in a single place. Those parameters and
instructions are specified in the form of props, which let
users add certain parameterized pre-written commands to their script to
execute in sequence. The actual execution is then handled by the
action()
function, which both prepares the script for
execution and then executes it. This basic pattern is modeled after the
fantastic recipes
package.
With that framework established, let’s walk through what exactly
scripts and props are and how they interact with action()
.
But first, we should talk about waiver()
.
Waivers
As we’ll discuss in a moment, unifir does a lot of input checking to make sure that scripts are going to execute successfully in an attempt to give users more useful feedback than Unity’s command line interface often offers. That involves making sure that scripts and props have the correct values provided to all of their parameters, and also validating that the user is going to have a working version of Unity to run these commands in at all.
Of course, a short list of places that don’t have a working version of Unity includes “CRAN check machines” and “GitHub actions”. And so as a result, even the simplest function calls will fail on CRAN – for instance, running the following would throw an error:
library(unifir)
make_script("example")
In order to work around this, I’ve borrowed an idea (and the entire
function) from ggplot2: waiver()
. The waiver()
function is a way to indicate to unifir that yes, you know this
value normally needs to be provided, and you know that it’s
missing, and that’s fine. All waiver()
does is
return an object of class waiver
:
waiver()
#> list()
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "waiver"
On its own, this object doesn’t do anything. However, in a few key
places, unifir will understand waiver()
as meaning “don’t
validate this argument”, which is essential for some odd props and CRAN
checks to succeed. I’ll be using it throughout this vignette, starting
with:
Scripts
The “script” is the core object in unifir. To create a script, we use
make_script
:
script <- make_script(
project = file.path(tempdir(), "unifir"),
unity = waiver() # Don't error if we can't find Unity
)
script
#> A `unifir_script` object with 0 props
#>
#> [1] name type
#> <0 rows> (or 0-length row.names)
This creates an R6 object
of the class unifir_script
. If you haven’t worked with R6
before, I recommend checking out the section of Advanced R on the
subject. At the end of the day, however, a script is effectively
just a glorified list. We can check out its contents using
names()
:
names(script)
#> [1] ".__enclos_env__" "using" "beats"
#> [4] "props" "initialize_project" "unity"
#> [7] "scene_exists" "scene_name" "script_name"
#> [10] "project" "clone" "initialize"
Some of these contents – .__encols_env__
,
clone
, initialize
– will be familiar to anyone
used to working with R6. Others, such as the file names for the scene
and script unifir is operating on, are set in make_script()
(and documented in ?make_script
) and default to
NULL
if not set:
all(
is.null(script$initialize_project),
is.null(script$scene_name),
is.null(script$script_name)
)
#> [1] TRUE
Others, like using
, beats
, and
props
, are a little bit more involved. We’ll use these
objects in order to track the props we add to our script; to talk about
that, it’s time we talk about props.
Props
At a low level, a unifir prop is just another R6 object, created
using the function unifir_prop()
:
prop_file <- tempfile()
file.create(prop_file)
#> [1] TRUE
prop <- unifir_prop(
prop_file = prop_file,
method_name = "ExampleName",
method_type = "ExampleMethod",
build = function(script, prop, debug) {},
using = "ExampleDependencies",
parameters = list()
)
prop
#> <unifir_prop>
#> Public:
#> build: function (script, prop, debug)
#> clone: function (deep = FALSE)
#> initialize: function (prop_file, method_name, method_type, parameters, build,
#> method_name: ExampleName
#> method_type: ExampleMethod
#> parameters: list
#> prop_file: /tmp/RtmpTtxgIv/fileb625e60c5b1
#> using: ExampleDependencies
Just as before, we can see our prop’s contents using
names()
:
names(prop)
#> [1] ".__enclos_env__" "using" "build" "parameters"
#> [5] "method_type" "method_name" "prop_file" "clone"
#> [9] "initialize"
These fields are all documented in ?unifir_prop
.
Prop objects are the actual method unifir uses to translate R inputs into C# methods. A typical prop will take some input parameters, provided either by the prop constructor function (more on that in a moment) or set at the script level, interpolate them into a pre-written C# method, and then add that method to a pile of C# code that will be run in sequence to produce a scene. Of course, the details of this process depend on what exactly the C# code is expected to do.
Most of those details are sorted out by prop constructor functions.
Rather than forcing users to use unifir_prop()
directly,
unifir provides a number of wrappers around this function to add
specific props to a script. For instance, if we look at the code that
powers our new_scene()
function:
new_scene
#> function (script, setup = c("EmptyScene", "DefaultGameObjects"),
#> mode = c("Additive", "Single"), method_name = NULL, exec = TRUE)
#> {
#> setup <- match.arg(setup)
#> mode <- match.arg(mode)
#> prop <- unifir_prop(prop_file = system.file("NewScene.cs",
#> package = "unifir"), method_name = method_name, method_type = "NewScene",
#> parameters = list(setup = setup, mode = mode), build = function(script,
#> prop, debug) {
#> glue::glue(readChar(prop$prop_file, file.info(prop$prop_file)$size),
#> .open = "%", .close = "%", method_name = prop$method_name,
#> setup = setup, mode = mode)
#> }, using = c("UnityEngine.SceneManagement", "UnityEditor",
#> "UnityEditor.SceneManagement"))
#> add_prop(script, prop, exec)
#> }
#> <bytecode: 0x5635ed300190>
#> <environment: namespace:unifir>
This prop takes two parameters – setup
and
mode
– and the top of the script makes sure they exist and
are passed correctly. We then get to the internal
unifir_prop()
call. This call passes
system.file("NewScene.cs", package = "unifir")
to the
prop_file
argument; if we print that file out we can see
that it’s a relatively simple C# method:
readLines(system.file("NewScene.cs", package = "unifir"))
#> [1] ""
#> [2] " static void %method_name%() {"
#> [3] " var newScene = EditorSceneManager.NewScene(NewSceneSetup.%setup%, NewSceneMode.%mode%);"
#> [4] " }"
This method calls EditorSceneManager.NewScene
, part of
Unity’s scripting API, and uses it to create a new scene. Because this
code relies on the “UnityEngine.SceneManagement”, “UnityEditor”, and
“UnityEditor.SceneManagement” namespaces, we’ve included those
namespaces in our prop’s using
argument. Our R code is only
going to edit three parts of this function, marked by %
signs – the method_name
, setup
, and
mode
arguments will all be replaced by their equivalent
values in R.
Moving further along the unifir_prop
call, we can then
see that method_name
is set to NULL
by
default. method_name
is a unique identifier for this
method of this prop, so should not be hard-coded or provided as a
default in your prop constructors. If you leave it as NULL
,
unifir will attempt to generate a name made of 4 random English words to
fill in the space.
The next argument, method_type
, is internally set to
NewScene
– users cannot control this value.
method_type
is meant to be a certain “key” associated with
your specific type of prop, which other props might search for if they
depend on or conflict with your code; as such, it generally shouldn’t be
configurable by your users.
We then see that our function parameters are passed as a list to the
parameters
argument. These will be essential for our next
argument, the build()
function, which constructs our C#
method. The build()
function of every prop must take three
(and only three) arguments: script
, the unifir script a
prop is stored in, prop
, the prop being built, and
debug
, which is discussed below. build()
methods with more arguments than this will cause errors. As a result,
all other parameters you need to construct your C# method must
be stored either in the prop or script object, and it is generally
easiest to store them in parameters
(which is not checked
by the R6 class).
The actual build function here is relatively simple, using
glue
to replace the snippets between %
symbols
with their R equivalents. If we don’t change any of the default
arguments to this function, that means our output C# method will look
something like this:
script <- new_scene(script)
script$props[[1]]$build(script, script$props[[1]])
#> static void BigFallObjectWould() {
#> var newScene = EditorSceneManager.NewScene(NewSceneSetup.EmptyScene, NewSceneMode.Additive);
#> }
The last part of our prop constructor is the add_prop
function, which registers the prop as part of our script. Its code is
incredibly simple, and mostly deals with creating the
script$beats
table:
add_prop
#> function (script, prop, exec = TRUE)
#> {
#> stopifnot(is.logical(exec))
#> stopifnot(methods::is(script, "unifir_script"))
#> idx <- nrow(script$beats) + 1
#> script$props[[idx]] <- prop
#> script$beats[idx, ]$idx <- idx
#> script$beats[idx, ]$name <- prop$method_name
#> script$beats[idx, ]$type <- prop$method_type
#> script$beats[idx, ]$exec <- exec
#> script$using <- c(script$using, prop$using)
#> script
#> }
#> <bytecode: 0x5635ed06b118>
#> <environment: namespace:unifir>
That table is relatively simple, storing four variables:
idx
, the order that methods will be executed in,
name
, the method_name
of each method,
type
, the method_type
of each method, and
exec
, a boolean representing whether or not that method
should be called in the final C# script:
script$beats
#> idx name type exec
#> NA 1 BigFallObjectWould NewScene TRUE
Action
With our props and scripts written, it’s showtime! We can use the
action
function to transform our R6 objects into an actual
C# script, and then execute that script in Unity.
The action()
does quite a few things. Namely, it:
- Checks if the Unity project needs to be created, and creates it if
so.
- Fills in any missing directory or file names that were left as
NULL
.
- Calls the
build()
method of each prop, in order ofscript$beats$idx
, and stores the constructed C# methods back in the script. - Creates a “caller” function that will call every method where
script$beats$exec
isTRUE
in sequential order.
- If
write = TRUE
, writes a final C# script to file. - If
exec = TRUE
, executes the final C# script in Unity.
Most of this process is internal and doesn’t matter for any prop
constructors you write. So long as your prop is idempotent and can be
constructed using its own build
argument,
action()
shouldn’t create any issues.
However, if it does cause trouble, action()
returns a
constructed script object with props replaced by their equivalent C#
code. That makes it easy to see how unifir interpreted your build
argument; for instance, we can run our example script through
action()
as so:
script <- make_script(
project = file.path(tempdir(), "unifir"),
unity = waiver(), # Don't error if we can't find Unity
initialize_project = FALSE, # Don't create the project -- so this runs on CRAN
script_name = "example_script"
)
script <- new_scene(script)
exec_script <- action(
script,
exec = FALSE,
write = TRUE
)
If we’re concerned about how unifir translated our prop code, we can
find the rendered C# inside props
:
exec_script$props
#> [1] "static void ShapeInventChanceSleep() {\n var newScene = EditorSceneManager.NewScene(NewSceneSetup.EmptyScene, NewSceneMode.Additive);\n}\n"
To see the entire produced C# script, we need to read the actual script file itself:
readLines(
file.path(tempdir(), "unifir", "Assets", "Editor", "example_script.cs")
)
#> [1] "using UnityEngine.SceneManagement;"
#> [2] "using UnityEditor;"
#> [3] "using UnityEditor.SceneManagement; "
#> [4] ""
#> [5] "public class example_script {"
#> [6] "static void ShapeInventChanceSleep() {"
#> [7] " var newScene = EditorSceneManager.NewScene(NewSceneSetup.EmptyScene, NewSceneMode.Additive);"
#> [8] "}"
#> [9] ""
#> [10] " static void MainFunc() {"
#> [11] " ShapeInventChanceSleep();"
#> [12] " }"
#> [13] "}"
Notice how this code matches our prop, with two additions: first, all
the namespaces we provided to using
are now imported at the
top of the script, and second a function MainFunc
has been
created to call our prop. When executing the C# script, unifir will
execute this MainFunc
method, which will in turn call each
prop once in the order it’s listed in script$beats
.
Debug
One last thing to know about unifir is that it is also built with a “debug” mode, in which functions will make no changes to your file system. unifir code checks if it’s running in debug mode using the following code:
function() {
debug <- FALSE
if (Sys.getenv("unifir_debugmode") != "" ||
!is.null(options("unifir_debugmode")$unifir_debugmode)) {
debug <- TRUE
}
debug
}
So if unifir_debugmode
is set to any value either as an
environment variable or as an option, unifir will avoid writing anything
to file or making any changes to a user’s computer.
When action()
is called, it will provide the current
state of debug
to your prop’s build
function.
For the majority of props, this can be safely ignored; if all your prop
does is add C# code to the final script, action()
will
respect debug on your behalf. However, if your prop makes changes to the
file system before the script is actually executed – for instance, by
moving prefabs to the project directory or editing configuration files
from R – make sure to wrap those sections of your prop in
if (!debug)
!
Cloning
While I’ve avoided getting too deep into the underlying mechanics of R6 here, there’s one stumbling block that I want to flag for anyone interested in developing with unifir.
The vast majority of objects in R have what’s referred to as
“copy-on-modify” semantics. Say for instance you have some object
x
:
x <- 2
x
#> [1] 2
If you assign x
to a new object, y
, we’d
expect y
and x
to both have the same
value:
y <- x
y == x
#> [1] TRUE
As an optimization on R’s part, not only are these objects both the
same value, but they actually both point to the same piece of data on
your machine. R only actually creates a new variable, pointing to its
own unique data, when you actually modify the object. As a result, when
you change the value of x
, you don’t in turn
change the value of y
: R makes a copy when you modify the
original object, so they now point to different data:
x <- 1
y == x
#> [1] FALSE
The same is not true for R6 objects, like unifir scripts and props. If you assign a prop to a new object, both of the objects will point to the same data, and changing one object will change them both. This is true whether you change the new object:
other_prop <- prop
other_prop$method_name <- "NewName"
prop$method_name
#> [1] "NewName"
Or the original one:
prop$method_name <- "AnotherName"
other_prop$method_name
#> [1] "AnotherName"
Instead, with R6 objects, we need to make an explicit copy. We can do
this using the clone()
function inside our prop object,
like so:
disconnected_prop <- prop$clone()
This creates an actual disconnected object, with the same values as the original it was cloned from. Now we can make changes to our prop (or script) without impacting any of the other copies:
disconnected_prop$method_name <- "OnlyIGetThisName"
prop$method_name
#> [1] "AnotherName"
Make sure that, if you’re trying to have multiple different versions
of a prop or a script, you use clone()
in your own
code!